Liverpool legend Graeme Souness made it clear that he didn't have an issue with Michael Oliver's refereeing performance during Wednesday's Merseyside derby.

The official came in for criticism from Virgil van Dijk after the game, with the Reds skipper saying Oliver did not have control of the clash, while Slot was clearly furious with the officiating on the night, earning himself a red card for his post-match protestations.

Liverpool and Slot, as well as assistant Sipke Hulshoff, have all since been charged by the FA for their behavior on the night — but it was an evening that Souness thoroughly enjoyed, and he felt as though Oliver's lenient refereeing contributed to the occasion.



Read More.

Mohamed Salah and Virgil van Dijk anger, Arne Slot's 115 charges joke, referee apology	Liverpool news: Virgil van Dijk points the finger at team-mate as Arne Slot speaks out	Liverpool news: Virgil van Dijk drops clear transfer hint as Arne Slot shares Man City theory

"The game was a throwback – refereed by an official who played his part in allowing a lot more to go on," he said in his Mail column.

"It was the kind of game that has been increasingly lost, because of all the Johnny-come-latelys who have changed our sport into the reduced spectacle it is today – much of it a very hard watch, with the passive football on display, the referee blowing his whistle for every nudge and the tedious simulation that goes on.

"Don’t get me wrong, there’s a huge amount to like about the modern game.

For those 100 or so minutes, the watered-down aspects of the modern game, which borders on a non-contact sport at times, went out the window."

Souness recalled his playing days and admitted he would have loved to have taken part in the match himself.

"What wouldn’t I give for just one day back in the kind of midfield cauldron we witnessed in that game," he added

In those games you were playing against the very best - not just the very best in terms of abilities but in the mental toughness