Former referee Mark Clattenburg has weighed in on the controversy surrounding Liverpool's winning goal against Everton, questioning the decision not to rule Diogo Jota's 57th-minute goal offside.

The former referee stated: "I think assistant referees, referees and VARs complicate their lives because in the past and always these decisions when they're so close, where a defender and an attacker are so close, for me this is an easy decision just to give offside because Luis Diaz wants to play the ball.

"The defender clearly wants to stop Luis Diaz getting to the ball.



He doesn't know that Luis Diaz is in an offside position, but he wants to stop the ball going through to him.

Steven Gerrard doesn't hide true feelings on Paddy Pimblett after UFC 314 win	Michael Oliver lands huge new role after Liverpool and Arne Slot red card controversy	Why Mohamed Salah could miss 10 Liverpool games next season after FIFA controversy

"Because he's then preventing Diaz getting into a goal-scoring opportunity, and when they're that close together, you could argue again there could be an impact on the defender's ability to play the ball.

"So there are some factors that can be covered under Law 11.

However, I'm sure PGMOL will hide behind that Luis Diaz is behind the defender, doesn't make an impact, he doesn't affect the ability to play the ball.

"And therefore will hide behind the subjective nature of this call, but for me, the simple decision is to give offside, and the one that football wants and understands is when a player, an attacking player and a defender are that close together, I believe football want that is offside."



Now, it was in a moment when Everton were playing in a low block, but most teams that are offensive want to have a high press, they want to go to the halfway line to play some players in an offside position, and then when the goalkeeper kicks it long, Virgil and Ibou go for a dual with a player that’s in an offside position
For more news relating to Everton, visit our sister site EFC Live.